|
|
|
|
Sexual Abuse Reading CentreSelf-Injury: Beyond the MythsSelf-injury basicsMost researchers agree that self injury (SI) is self-inflicted physical harm severe enough to cause tissue damage or marks that last for several hours, done without suicidal intent or intent to attain sexual pleasure. Body markings or modifications that are done as part of a spiritual ritual or for ornamentation purposes generally aren't considered SI. SI generally is done as a way of coping with overwhelming psychophysiological arousal. This can be to express emotion, to deal with feelings of unreality or numbness, to make flashbacks stop, to punish the self and stop self-hating thoughts, or to deal with a feeling of impending explosion. SI is more about relieving tension or distress than is it about anything else. Although cutting is the most common form of SI, burning and head-banging are also very common. Other forms include biting, skin-picking, hair-pulling, hitting the body with objects or hitting objects with the body. SI is a crude, ultimately destructive coping mechanism, but it works. That's why it sometimes seems to have addictive qualities. To help a client, you must offer more effective coping strategies as replacement. Learning these ways can take time; punishing a client or patient for coping in the only way he or she knows can make therapy unworkable. Most people who self-injure hate the term "self-mutilation." That phrase speaks to intent and maiming the body is usually not the intent of SI anyway. Better terms are self-inflicted violence, self-harm, and self-injury.
Self-injury is probably the result of many different factors. Among them:
Lack of role models and invalidation — most people who self-injure were
chronically invalidated in some way as children (many self-injurers report
abuse, but almost all report chronic invalidation). They never learned
appropriate ways of expressing emotion and may have learned that emotions are
bad and to be avoided.
Biological predisposition — evidence is accumulating that indicates self-
injurers have specific problems within the brain's serotonergic system that
cause an increase in impulsivity and aggression. Impulsive aggression,
combined with a belief that expressing it outwardly is unthinkably bad, might
lead to the aggression being turned inward.
Studies have suggested that when people who self-injure get emotionally
overwhelmed, an act of self-harm almost immediately brings their levels of
psychophysiological tension and arousal back to a bearable baseline level. In
other words, they feel a strong uncomfortable emotion, don't know how to
handle it, and know that hurting themselves will reduce the emotional
discomfort quickly. They may still feel bad, but they don't have that panicky,
jittery, trapped feeling. Self-injurers come from all walks of life and all economic brackets. People
who harm themselves may be male or female; gay, straight, or bi; Ph.D.s or
high-school dropouts; rich or poor; and live in any country in the world. Some
people who SI manage to function effectively in demanding jobs; they are
teachers, therapists, medical professionals, lawyers, professors, engineers.
Some are on disability. Some are highly achieving high-school students.
Their ages typically range from early teens to early 60s, although they may be
older or younger. In fact, the incidence of self-injury is about the same as
that of eating disorders, but because it's so highly stigmatized, most people
hide their scars, burns, and bruises carefully. They also can have excuses to
offer when someone asks about the scars (there are a lot of really vicious
cats around).
People who deliberately harm themselves are no more psychotic than people who
drown their sorrows in a bottle of vodka are. It's a coping mechanism, just
not one that's as understandable to most people and as accepted by society as
alcoholism, drug abuse, overeating, anorexia, bulimia, workaholism, smoking
cigarettes, and other forms of problem avoidance are.
Self-injury is VERY RARELY a failed suicide attempt. People who inflict
physical harm on themselves are often doing it in an attempt to maintain
psychological integrity -- it's a way to keep from killing themselves. They
release unbearable feelings and pressures through self-harm, easing their urge
toward suicide. Some people who self-injure do later attempt suicide, but they
almost always use a method different from their preferred method of self-harm.
Self-injury is a maladaptive coping mechanism, a way to stay alive.
Unfortunately, some people don't understand this and think that involuntary
commitment is the only way to deal with a person who self-harms.
Hospitalization, especially forced, can do more harm than good.
Medications (mood stabilizers, anxiolytics, antidepressants, and some of the
newer neuroleptics) have been tried with some success. There is no magic pill
for stopping self-harm (naltrexone, though effective in people with
developmental disabilities, doesn't seem to work nearly as well in other
patients). Many therapeutic approaches have been and are being developed to
help self-harmers learn new coping mechanisms and teach them how to use those
techniques instead of self-injury. They reflect a growing belief among mental-
health workers that once a client's patterns of self-inflicted violence
stabilize, work can be done on the problems and issues underlying the self-
injury. This does not mean that patients should be coerced into stopping self-injury.
Any attempts to reduce or control the amount of self-harm a person does should
be based in the client's willingness to undertake the difficult work of
controlling and/or stopping self-injury. Treatment should not be based on a
practitioner's personal feelings about the practice of self-harm.
Self-injury brings out many uncomfortable feelings in people: revulsion,
anger, fear, and distaste, to name a few. Medical professionals who are unable
to cope with their own feelings about self-harm have an obligation to
themselves and their clients to find a practitioner willing to do this work.
In addition, they are responsible for ensuring that the client understands the
referral is due to their own inability to deal with self-injury and not to any
inadequacies in the client. People who self-injure do generally do so because of an internal dynamic and
not in order to annoy, anger or irritate others. Their self-injury is a
behavioral response to an emotional state and is usually not done in order to
frustrate caretakers. In emergency rooms, people with self-inflicted wounds
are often told directly and indirectly that they are not as deserving of care
as someone who has an accidental injury. Doctors in emergency rooms and urgent-care clinics should be sensitive to the
needs of patients who come in to have self-inflicted wounds treated. If the
patient is calm, denies suicidal intent, and has a history of SI, the doctor
should treat the wounds as they would treat accidental injuries. Refusing
anesthesia for stitches, making disparaging remarks, and treating the patient
as an inconvenient nuisance simply further the feelings of invalidation and
unworthiness the self-injurer has. It is useful to offer mental-health follow-
up services; however, psychological evaluations with an eye toward
hospitalization should be avoided in the ER unless the person is clearly a
danger to self or to others. In places where people know that seeking
treatment for self-inflicted injuries are liable to lead to mistreatment and
lengthy psychological evaluations, they are much less likely to seek medical
attention for their wounds and thus are at a higher risk for wound infections
and other complications.
©1999 by Deb Martinson. Reproduction and distribution of this material is
enthusiastically encouraged, especially distribution to medical personnel.
References
[ Recovery Canada Main Page ] [ Site Map ] [ Support ] [ Resources ]
|